Being Of Light

Address: http://SpiritualManna.org
http://Institutionalized-Ignorance.tk
![]()
Mystics And Visionaries Are The True Researchers And Scientists Of Life
They Seek The Answers To Life Without The Limitations Of Doctrine, Dogma, Or Politics
Jesus Was A Mystic Who Taught Others To Seek The Spiritual Path
![]()

All people possess the innate ability to Communicate Directly with God.
Jesus taught that if we consecrate the body and open the mind, that we will permit the inner door within us to open.
"Behold, I stand at the door and knock. If anyone hears My voice and opens the door, I will come in to him and dine with him, and he with
Me".
(Rev 3:20 NKJ)
"Enter by the narrow gate; for wide is the gate and broad is the way that leads to destruction, and there are many who go in by it.
Because narrow is the gate and difficult is the way which leads to life, and there are few who find it."
(Matt 7:13-14 NKJ)
."God gives you all truth, as a ladder with many
steps, for the salvation and perfection of the soul,
and
the truth which seems today, you will abandon for the higher truth tomorrow.
Press toward perfection."
(Gospel Of The Nazirenes)
In the Cosmic Higher Reality, there is only One Source of Genuine Knowledge
From an Earthly Perspective, the only genuine knowledge is that Knowledge that enables us to Tap Into our own Inner Source of Knowledge
Institutionalized Government Secular Schools totally alienate the child from Genuine Knowledge
Institutionalized Churches sever the child from the Genuine Temple of their Souls
"Do you not know that you are the temple of God and that the Spirit of God dwells in you?
If anyone defiles the temple of God, God will destroy him.
For the temple of God is holy, which temple you are"
(1 Cor 3:16-17 NKJ)
"And if anyone causes one of these little ones who believe in me to sin,
it would be better for him to be thrown into the sea with a large millstone tied around his neck"
(Mark 9:42 NIV)
Mahatma Gandhi said that he read the Christian Bible every day, but he would not convert to Christianity because he had yet to find a Christian who actually followed the teachings of Jesus. In fact, as a dedicated Bible reader it was Gandhi's position that the whole world would be the followers of Jesus, if it were not for the people who called themselves Christian.
Institutionalized Religion: Was Gandhi right in his assessment? Does it matter? From the perspective of my own spiritual experiences as an Ebionite Nazirene Mystic who has intimately followed the teachings of Jesus and TheWay, let me confirm to you that Gandhi was fundamentally correct in his assertions. Contrary to the dogma of the Roman Catholic Church, Jesus did not ordain an institutionalized church (see The Death Of The Religion Of Jesus). The True Church of Jesus is Spiritual -- and can only be entered by those who intimately embrace the very essence of Jesus' teachings (see Gate Of Eden). And sadly, when the Protestant Reformers broke away from the Church of Rome, they merely built upon the counterfeit structure of what the Emperor Constantine had created in the fourth century. In many respects, Protestantism was as much a political movement as it was religious -- and those who suggested that the whole Roman institutionalized model was defective, were condemned as heretics.
Institutionalized Learning: The man known as the Apostle Paul sweepingly condemned the wisdom of this world as "foolishness" -- stating that it will come to naught. And while Christians claim to hold Paul's wisdom above that of the Disciples of Jesus, by their actions they render Paul an idiot! If they actually believed Paul, they would not send their children to government institutionalized secular schools to not only learn the wisdom that Paul deemed defective, but to learn worldly theories, concepts and Atheistic quasi-theology that totally denies everything that both Jesus and Paul ever taught.
Institutionalized
Culture Of Destruction: Jesus
condemned the ways of this world as evil and satanic, and yet people who call
themselves his followers immerse the whole of their lives in it's mindset and
lifestyle. The first followers of Jesus called themselves Ebionites
-- i.e., the "poor ones"
-- because they knew that to be a disciple or follower of Jesus, one had to be
in the world and not of it! Was Jesus and his first followers
misinformed and out of touch with reality? Unfortunately, the
thinking of most people today has been thoroughly molded by Hollywood, Madison
Avenue, MTV, and our politically correct culture that immerses the vast majority
of people in the darkness of ignorance -- ignorance about themselves, as well as
ignorance about the life they are living. Unbeknown to most people,
institutionalized religion and institutionalized learning are mere extensions
that support the tenets of the Culture of Destruction. And while the
churches may put on a quasi-religious facade -- using rhetoric that attempts to
portray them in a spiritual role -- and at times they appear to take positions
in opposition to the Culture of Destruction -- in truth there is only a slight
degree of separation and differences.
A
true Disciple of TheWay is one who embraces the very essence of Jesus'
teachings, and travels the mystical path that transcends the limitations of this
world in pursuit of genuine spiritual knowledge, wisdom and
understanding. At the beginning of our Common Era they
differentiated between genuine spiritual knowledge gained through one's own
spiritual/mystical experiences by calling this type of knowledge "gnosis".
Those who possessed this spiritual gnosis were referred to as Gnostics -- of
whom under the heading of Gnosticism, the Encyclopedia
Britannica states: “Among the
majority of the followers of the movement, 'Gnosis' was understood not as
meaning 'knowledge' or 'understanding', in our sense of the word, but
'revelation'. These little Gnostic
sects and groups all lived in the conviction that they possessed a secret and
mysterious knowledge, in no way accessible to those outside, which was not to be
proved or propagated, but believed in by the initiated, and anxiously guarded as
a secret. This knowledge of theirs
was not based on reflection, on scientific inquiry and proof, but on revelation.
It was derived directly from the times of primitive Christianity, from
the Savior himself and from his disciples and friends, with whom they claimed to
be connected by a secret tradition, or else from later prophets, of whom many
sects boasted. It was laid down in
wonderful mystic writings, which were in the possession of the various
circles”. How far we
have deviated from the teachings of Jesus can perhaps best be demonstrated in
the reality that the word gnosis and Gnostic today
is more descriptive of someone who is a heretic, than a man or woman of
spiritual wisdom and insight. When
we speak, then, of Gnostic gnosis or knowledge, it is important to understand
that we are not speaking of knowledge in our sense of the word -- but rather,
knowledge in the sense that Paul and Jesus spoke about.
With regard to this gnosis Paul writes: “But
God hath revealed them unto us by his Spirit”
(1 Cor 2:10 KJV).
Thus the words: “This
knowledge of theirs was not based on reflection, on scientific inquiry and
proof, but on revelation”.
Those
believers known as the historical Gnostic Christians were witnesses to the exact
same spiritual reality that Paul writes to us about in his epistle -- i.e., that
man has the ability to learn directly from God through man's own spiritual
nature -- and this is confirmed in the words of Paul when he wrote: “This
is what we speak, not in words taught us by human wisdom but in words taught by
the Spirit, expressing spiritual truths in spiritual words”
(1 Cor 2:13 NIV).
Thus, the sacred truths of Paul and the Gnostic Christians were beyond
the perception of what Paul called “the
wisdom of this world”.
Of
the difference between carnal knowledge and spiritual knowledge, Paul writes: “Where
is the wise man? Where is the scholar? Where is the philosopher of this age? Has
not God made foolish the wisdom of the world?”
(1 Cor 1:20 NIV).
Why?
Because, like the Sadducees and Pharisees, the wise man, scholar, and
philosopher of this world fail to look beyond what is grasped through the
physical senses in the creation of their theories pertaining to life and this
world.
In the same way that within the scriptures there are numerous
inconsistencies and symbols that point the disciple beyond the letter of what is
written, all of creation is fabricated in the same mold in which the Bible
itself is written.
Thus, what the Apostle writes is that the foolishness of the philosopher
of this age, is no different than the foolishness of the believer who sees only
the body of the scriptures -- or what the Apostle calls, the testimony of
Christ.
Regarding
the claim of the Gnostic Christians reported in the Britannica that their secret
doctrine: “was derived directly from
the times of primitive Christianity, from the Savior himself and from his
disciples and friends, with whom they claimed to be connected by a secret
tradition, or else from later prophets, of whom many sects boasted”,
in the words of Clement of Alexandria: “The
Lord… allowed us to communicate to those Divine Mysteries, and of that holy
light, to those who are able to receive them.
He did not certainly disclose to the many what did not belong to the
many; but to the few to whom He knew that they belonged, who were capable of
receiving and being molded according to them”.
What
the believers of the simple faith have continually failed to realize down
through the ages is that, in order to learn of God, and enter the Kingdom, one
must have a total and complete change of mind and heart (“Repent, for the
kingdom of heaven is at hand”) -- i.e., “open
and unloose the mind, for the kingdom of heaven is at hand”
-- and this total change of mind and heart can only be brought about in the life
of the believer when there is a reversal of direction, as in the biblical phrase
to “turn about”.
What the Bible states is that it is impossible for us to be taught the
sacred truths that we need to know in the manner of the worldly wise man,
scholar and philosopher.
It is not a matter of teaching as we do in our modern educational
systems, because man is incapable of comprehending higher reality so long as he
is inhibited by the ten percent limitation the physical body imposes upon his
mind.
It
is for this reason that the wise man of the spirit has always incorporated
certain rituals that the carnal believer follows -- but in reality, these
rituals exist as forms, figures and patterns of what must be accomplished in
spirit.
When we begin to understand these facts, we are then able to perceive the
reason why Jesus condemned the Pharisees when he said: “Woe
to you, teachers of the law and Pharisees, you hypocrites! You clean the outside
of the cup and dish, but inside they are full of greed and self-indulgence.
Blind Pharisee! First clean the inside of the cup and dish, and then the outside
also will be clean” (Matt 23:25-26
NIV).
What
is conveyed in the above words is no different than when Origen and the early
Church Fathers wrote that the reading of scripture as history and the observance
of rituals in the flesh, do very little for the believer.
What is it that the Apostle is expressing when he writes: “Therefore
let us leave the elementary teachings about Christ”?
The elementary teachings of the Christ is what was taught to the
believers at Corinth: “For in him you
have been enriched in every way -- in all your speaking and in all your
knowledge -- because our testimony about Christ was confirmed in you. Therefore
you do not lack any spiritual gift as you eagerly wait for our Lord Jesus Christ
to be revealed” (1 Cor 1:5-7 NIV).
The elementary teachings are the doctrine of “Jesus
Christ and him crucified” (1 Cor 2:2
NIV).
The
resurrection of the dead and eternal judgment must be understood as man's return
to his true innate spiritual nature.
In the words of Clement of Alexandria in his description of the Lord's
mission: “For He was clothed with all
virtue; and it was His aim to lead man, the foster-child of the world, up to the
objects of intellect, and to the most essential truths by knowledge, from one
world to another”.
It
was the carnal believers who could not embrace the “elementary
principles of the oracles of God” --
who continued in a state of perpetual redemption -- using the rituals of the
Lord in the manner of the Sadducees and Pharisees for the endless forgiveness of
sins, rather than the means of moving on to maturity.
Thus, the carnal believers who failed to “open
and unloose the mind”, remained
stagnant -- and their involvement in the gospel was little more than a
philosophical and superficial outward change.
It was these carnal believers who perpetually remained babes in Christ --
ever sipping on the milk of the gospel, and never partaking of the solid food of
the spirit.
When the spiritual Christians attempted to explain to them the deeper
meaning of life, themselves, and the Word, the carnal Christians condemned the
spiritual Christians, and called them heretics.
They will do the same exact thing in our present time.
![]()
The Wholesale Rejection Of Wisdom
The All-Encompassing Denial Of Messiah/Christ
Mahatma Gandhi said that he had yet to find a Christian who actually followed the teachings of Jesus, because he read the Bible to learn what Jesus taught, rather then to confirm the tenets of a predetermined doctrine of belief. And what he saw in the Bible was so radically different than what the Churches believed, that he simply refused to be unfaithful to Jesus and the teachings of TheWay.
The Incomprehensible Mysteries of God! This web page began as a reply to a question about the difference between the Son of God/Logos and the historical Yeshua/Jesus as presented on the Ebionite web site -- which represents the beliefs held by those who Jesus himself taught. But if I were to just simply reply and explain the difference, there was an excellent chance that what I wrote would be incomprehensible to the person who asked the question. Why? The answer goes to the very heart of why Paul warned the baptized and committed believers at Corinth that he could not convey to them the higher truths of the Gospel which is often referred to as the Mysteries of God, and confessed that while he was among them he was only able to speak of “Jesus Christ, and him crucified” (1 Cor 2:2 KJV) -- which Paul referred to as the "milk" of the Gospel, rather than the "solid food" that can only be comprehended by those who were spiritually mature (1 Cor 3:2). And what we are presented with in these often ignored and profound words of Paul, is the very cause of not only the source of all religious differences the world over, but also the reason for the total ineffectiveness of all our secular and non-secular educational systems, colleges and universities -- and their inability to teach and enlighten the students and all people on a world-wide basis as to the very truths and knowledge that is necessary to comprehend virtually anything of value throughout every aspect of life itself. Thus, that mankind is totally ignorant of the great truth that Paul was attempting to convey, is the reason why I titled this web page Institutionalized Ignorance!
The problem is that few people possess the insight to comprehend the far-reaching warning of Paul when he attempted to explain that people who he described as being of a "natural" mindset -- which in chapter three he related to being of a "carnal" state of mind -- and warned that he could not convey to them their own higher spiritual reality and the Mysteries of God because they would perceive and judge his words and teachings to be pure "foolishness" and utter nonsense: "But the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned" (1 Cor 2:14 KJV). So what this means is that everything that we read in the pages of the Bible and other scriptures is elementary -- i.e., milk for people of an immature mind. And it is therefore necessary for the authors of the Bible to convey sacred truths and the Mysteries of God in a series of allegorical forms and symbols that begin to deepen the mind of the reader to the incomprehensible truths that it is impossible to convey in a straightforward and literal manner. In the words of Clement of Alexandria: “For the Divine Being cannot be declared as it exists; but as we who are lettered in the flesh were able to listen” (see Why God Speaks To Us In Allegory And Enigma).
In his Epistle to these believing and confirmed Christians at Corinth who Paul describes as “...that in everything you were enriched in Him, in all speech and all knowledge, even as the testimony concerning Christ was confirmed in you, so that you are not lacking in any gift, awaiting eagerly the revelation of our Lord Jesus Christ, who shall also confirm you to the end, blameless in the day of our Lord Jesus Christ” (1 Cor 1:5-8 NAS), we can if we open our minds to what he is stating, begin to get a sense of the dark dilemma that seduces mankind in his quest to know and understand the meaning and purpose of life. But what is Paul saying? If we pose the question: What Christian today has been taught by a man of the vision and insight of the person known as the Apostle Paul? And yet Paul states that he could not do what the vast majority of both Jewish and Christian clergy do today -- i.e., convey to the people the true spiritual meaning of the Gospel that Jesus taught. Why? Why could Paul not convey to those people he taught in person the great truths that they needed to know? In answer to this question Paul explains that “And I, brethren, could not speak to you as to spiritual men, but as to men of flesh, as to babes in Christ” (1 Cor 3:1 NAS). Thus, the believers who Paul himself personally taught, could only be taught the “testimony” of Jesus Christ and him crucified (1 Cor 2:2), because they were not yet spiritual men -- but rather, they were men of flesh and still very much “babes in Christ”. Paul then explains that: “I gave you milk to drink, not solid food; for you were not yet able to receive it. Indeed, even now you are not yet able” (1 Cor 3:2 NAS). What should be troubling to the modern believer is that Paul openly admits that the baptized and confirmed Christians at Corinth -- people who had received the gifts of the laying on of hands and speaking in tongues -- people who were not taught by preachers and priests, but the Apostle himself -- were not yet able to understand the Mysteries of the Gospel of God because they were yet “babes in Christ”, and had not been made perfect through the consecration of the body and the Anointing of the Mind. And the far-reaching reality that Paul unsuccessfully attempted to convey to both the believes then and now, is seen in his words where he warned that: “the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned” (1 Cor 2:14 KJV).
Once
properly understood, what the Apostle is stating is synonymous with the
words of the first-century Clement who was himself the disciple of Peter when
he wrote: “We remember that our
Lord and teacher, as commanding, said to us, guard the mysteries for me, and
the sons of my house. Wherefore
also he explained to his disciples, privately, the mysteries of the kingdoms
of the heavens” (Clementine
Homilies). Why was the Mysteries
to be guarded and possessed by the few? Because the vast majority
of believers were simply not prepared to even begin to envision their own
higher spiritual reality. And this incomprehensible reality is
further expounded on by
Clement of Alexandria when he wrote: “The
Lord… allowed us to communicate to those Divine Mysteries, and of that holy
light, to those who are able to receive them.
He did not certainly disclose to the many what did not belong to the
many; but to the few to whom He knew that they belonged, who were capable of
receiving and being molded according to them.
But Secret things are entrusted to speech, not to writing as in the
case with God… And to him who is able secretly to observe what is delivered
to him, that which is veiled shall be disclosed as truth; and what is hidden
to the many shall appear manifest to the few”
(Stromata).
What
Paul was stating to the Corinthians was that he could not teach, discuss, or
even reveal in any manner to them the Mysteries of God -- in that, God's Sacred Secrets
cannot be given to profane and carnal minds.
What is further demonstrated in this Epistle is that even though a
person is a Jew or Christian who accepts Messiah/Christ, repents, and is
baptized in the manner of the people at Corinth, this does not make them
spiritual -- and neither does this beginning of the walk in TheWay denote the
second birth spoken of in the Gospel of John (see Rebirth
vs Church Doctrine). That
Paul could not even speak of the Mysteries to these baptized and committed
Christians -- higher realities that they would view as pure "foolishness"
-- because they were yet of a carnal and natural mindset --
demonstrates that the Apostle held fast to the commandment of Jesus when he
said: “Give
not that which is holy unto the dogs, neither cast your pearls before the
swine” (Mt 7:6).
Again, the biblical meaning of the term dogs and swine that I have
previously provided throughout my writings is defined as those who attempt to
embrace Messiah/Christ, but in their thinking and manner of life they remain
very much a part of the culture of this world.
Those
readers familiar with early Christian history know that during the first three
centuries there was great strife between certain groups of believers.
Yet, in not understanding the depth of the Apostle Paul's Epistles,
modern Christians generally fail to realize the source of this conflict.
What is clear in First Corinthians was that there were two classes of
Christians: Those who knew only the testimony of “Christ
and him crucified”, and those who
went beyond the exoteric doctrine of Christ which Paul referred to as "milk", and
those who embraced the process of spiritual transformation and maturity and learned the Mysteries of God
that Paul could not speak openly about.
“Howbeit we speak
wisdom among them that are perfect,”
writes Paul, “yet not the wisdom of
this world, nor of the princes of this world, that come to naught: But we
speak the wisdom of God in a mystery, even the hidden wisdom, which God
ordained before the world unto our glory”
(1 Cor 2:6-7 KJV).
The
Suppressed Mind Of Natural Man: In
these words Paul is warning the believers at Corinth that he can only speak
about the Wisdom and Mysteries of God to those who are perfect.
Yet, the carnal believer throughout the history of the church has
traditional rejected these words of the Apostle -- even rejecting the concept
of perfection as heresy.
How could Paul not, when it is realized that natural man only used
approximately 10% of his potential of mind, and Paul is making reference to
the fact that only those people who are capable of using the other ninety
percent of the mind is able to perceive and comprehend what the Bible calls
the Mysteries of God. Carnal
man who knows virtually nothing of his threefold nature, simply has no means
to relate to the soul and spiritual realities that Paul can only hint at in
his Epistles. Moreover,
contrary to modern Christian doctrine, the Apostle does not say perfect faith
-- perfect belief -- or some philosophical idea of perfection by virtue of
membership in a religious group. The
idea of perfection from a biblical perspective is complete in all its parts --
and because we cling to manmade doctrines, we do not believe that man is
capable of this state of perfection, which the Apostle continually speaks of,
throughout his writings.
In
Paul’s warning to the believers at Corinth, the Apostle then uses a phrase
that is found in the Old Testament, the New Testament, and the writings of the
early Church Fathers, and writes: “But
as it is written, Eye hath not seen, nor ear heard, neither have entered into
the heart of man, the things which God hath prepared for them that love him”
(1 Cor 2:9 KJV). This
statement is of course fundamental to a Gnostic, or Spiritual Church.
What
is written by Paul is no different than what the Church Father Origen (see The
Secret Doctrine) stated was the primary difference between the gospel
given to the multitudes, and those who were worthy to be in the house with the
Lord: “Then Jesus sent the
multitude away, and went into the house: and his disciples came unto him,
saying, Declare unto us the parable of the tares of the field”
(Matt 13:36 KJV). In our
quest to understand why there were two doctrines, the Bible itself openly
declares in the words of Jesus: “Unto
you it is given to know the mystery of the kingdom of God: but unto them that
are without, all these things are done in parables: That seeing they may see,
and not perceive; and hearing they may hear, and not understand”
(Mark 4:11-12 KJV).
Who
is permitted to understand a parable? What
the Bible tells us is that only a genuine disciple of the Lord in search of
Truth. All other believers
and non-believers alike are said to be “without”
-- or outside the house. In
the words of the Church Father Origen: “I have not
yet spoken of the observances of all that is written in the gospel, each one
of which contains much doctrine difficult to be understood, not merely by the
multitude, but even by certain of the more intelligent, including a very
profound explanation of the parables, which Jesus delivered to 'those without'
while reserving the exhibition of their full meaning for those who have passed
beyond the stage of exoteric teachings, and who came to him privately in the
house. And when he comes to
understand it, he will admire the reason why some are said to be without, and
others in the house”.
What did Jesus mean when he said that the Mysteries of God only belonged to those who were present with him "in the house"? The answer is found in what is perhaps the most important single verse in the Bible -- a verse that contains a profound warning of Jesus that is ignored by the vast majority of people who read the Bible -- and this ignored warning is in the parable of the Sower and the Seed, and is seen in the words: “Know ye not this parable? and how then will ye know all parables?” (Mark 4:13 KJV). What is being conveyed by Jesus in these words is that only those who know the true meaning of this parable -- and embrace that meaning in all its fullness -- can know the meaning to not only all the other parables, but also the Mysteries of God and everything else of any true substance. Why? Because we have a threefold reality that few people whose thinking is of this world is capable of even envisioning. What this means is that while our physical nature is manifest in this three-dimensional realm, our soul nature simultaneously dwells in a parallel realm -- our spiritual nature simultaneously dwells in yet another realm -- and at the very essence of our being is the Kingdom of God that Jesus taught was within us (Luke 17:20-21). When Jesus warned that a "divided house" cannot stand, he was making reference to all men who exist in a divided state with respect to their inner soul and spiritual natures.
When Paul warned that men of a "natural" mind would look upon the Mysteries of God as "foolishness", he said this because we are not beings of flesh -- and we are not what we appear to be when we look upon the reflected reality of the body-vessel we presently inhabit in the mirror. And while our true soul and spiritual reality was near impossible to even describe to people who lived 2000 years ago, our modern technology and science has made intelligent speculation more feasible from the perspective of the average person. Quoting the article on Science Proves Religion we are presented with a reality that the vast majority of people are simply not prepared to envision.
Natural Man Incapable of Comprehending Creation or the Bible: In the first two chapters of Paul’s First Epistle to the Corinthians the Apostle very clearly teaches that there is the “testimony” of Messiah/Christ that is preached to the multitudes of people, and the “mysteries” of the Gospel that cannot even be contemplated by those believers who have yet to be transformed by the Spirit, and are still of a natural organic state of mind. While this reality was difficult for men such as Martin Luther and Darwin to envision, this is no longer the case in our present time. Luckily, our modern scientific advances have provided us with great insight into understanding what Paul was attempting to convey to the mind of the still carnal believer. Once we are able to comprehend that we are dwelling in a non-mechanical “…holographic universe” that is now being described as being of an intelligent nature -- i.e., and appears to us in every way as "...a great thought" -- only then can we begin to truly understand the universal plight of man that Yeahus/Jesus came to free us from. Further, what the Bible portrays as Satan -- both collectively and as a singular being who opposes the Heavenly Kingdom -- can more appropriately be portrayed as the power or force which bonds and shackles us to this world through the organic physical body/vessels we are presently residing in.
Looking In The Wrong Direction: In the realization that traditional scientific inquiry can never provide the answers to life, thoughtful physicists in greater number have begun to notice the curious parallels between their own findings and ancient mystical descriptions of reality. These similarities were pointed out in the book, The Tao Of Physics, by Fritjof Capra, and The Dancing Wu Li Masters by Gary Zukav. Zukav’s book takes its title from the Chinese expression for physics, wu li, which he translates as “patterns of organic energy”, and writes: “Bell’s theorem not only suggests that the world is quite different than it seems, it demands it. Something very exciting is happening. Physicists have ‘proved’ rationally that our rational ideas about the world in which we live are profoundly deficient”.
![]()
Creation
The Great Thought
Remembering that Paul warned that the Mysteries of God are beyond human comprehension, and would be viewed as "foolishness" by the people of this world who are of a "natural" mind, the reality of life is that we exist because God is thinking not only us, but all that exists. Our reality is perhaps best portrayed in the words of the scriptures: "God, who made the world and everything in it, since He is Lord of heaven and earth, does not dwell in temples made with hands. Nor is He worshiped with men's hands, as though He needed anything, since He gives to all life, breath, and all things. And He has made from one blood every nation of men to dwell on all the face of the earth, and has determined their preappointed times and the boundaries of their dwellings, so that they should seek the Lord, in the hope that they might grope for Him and find Him, though He is not far from each one of us; for in Him we live and move and have our being, as also some of your own poets have said, 'For we are also His offspring.'" (Acts 17:24-28 NKJ).
What is the meaning of these words? An interesting observation is made in the Jamieson, Fausset, and Brown Bible Commentary for these verses: "[For in him we live, and move, and have our being], [kai (grk 2532) esmen (grk 2070)]-- more simply, `live, and move, and exist. ' This means, not merely (as Meyer explains it), `Without Him we have no life, nor that motion which every inanimate nature displays, nor even existence itself: ' it means that God is the living immanent Principle of all these in men. It will be observed that the words, "in Him we live, and move, and exist," constitute in themselves a descending series; but viewed in relation to the speaker's purpose, they have (as Lechler notices) all the force of an ascending climax. Life, it is true, is more than motion, and motion more than bare being; but the apostle's thought is, `Without God-- isolated and apart from God-- we should have no life; consequently, no motion; and so, no existence. ' [As certain also of your own poets have said, For we are also his offspring.] This is the first half of the fifth line, word for word, of an astronomical poem of Aratus, a Greek countryman of the apostle's and his predecessor by about three centuries. It is found also (nearly as here) in a religious hymn of Cleanthes of Troas, a contemporary of Aratus. But, as our speaker hints, the same sentiment is to be found in other Greek poets. They meant it, doubtless, in a pantheistic sense; but the truth which it expresses the apostle turns to his own purpose-- to teach a pure, personal, spiritual Theism." While the Bible Commentary may relate these words of the Apostle and the concept to Pantheism, higher reality proves the words of the Apostle that "...in Him we live and move and have our being... 'For we are also His offspring.'"
Why? Because what we see with our physical eyes is a mere blemish in the field. In the words of the scientest: “Today there is a wide measure of agreement… that the stream of knowledge is heading towards a non-mechanical reality; the universe begins to look more like a great thought than like a great machine... The stuff of the universe is mind-stuff... “an intelligent universe” whose apparent concreteness is generated by cosmic data from an unknowable, organized source -- a hologram that causes “…our brains to mathematically construct hard reality by interpreting frequencies from a dimension transcending time and space. The brain is a hologram, interpreting a holographic universe.”
![]()
The Paradox Of Reality
And Individuality
In
an honest appraisal of the scriptures the Rev. Charles Spurgeon wrote in his
autobiography: “The system of truth revealed in the
Scriptures is not simply one straight line, but two; and no man will ever get
a right view of the gospel until he knows how to look at the two lines at
once.... Two truths cannot be contradictory to each other... and it is only my
folly that leads me to imagine that these two truths can ever contradict each
other” (Charles H. Spurgeon, Autobiography Vol. 1: The Early
Years. pp. 173, 174).
Rev.
Spurgeon could not bring the two lines of Gospel Truth together -- speaking of
them as his “folly” to even imagine
that two of God's teachings could contradict each other.
Yet, Rev. Spurgeon makes an astute and honest observation that, to
their own demise, few Jews and Christians throughout history have been willing
to admit.
It is absolutely necessary for us to come to terms with the fact that
truth is not only paradoxical, but that in our natural-carnal state, we are
unable to bring these paradoxes together.
In fact, this wide-eyed perception of reality is so important, that we
can never progress beyond the very limited point we are presently at, until we
realize this great truth.
Why?
Because it is in the realization of what Spurgeon calls his ”folly”
that we begin to open our minds to the reality that exists beyond the physical
barrier of this world.
What
Rev. Spurgeon failed to understand is that this same dilemma has plagued
mankind since the very dawn of time itself.
The Bible, as with all of life, literally exists in a sea of paradoxes
-- paradoxes that on the surface appear to oppose each other because we cannot
harmonize and balance the two opposing truths -- and these two opposing lines
are consciously built into the text of the scriptures.
Moreover, from his and the perspective of the Christian world, the two
lines of truth that Rev. Spurgeon writes about can never be resolved, because
he/they are missing the third element to the equation.
It is the presence of this third great truth -- the one that brings the
two conflicting and contradicting lines together into an abiding harmony and
oneness -- and the means to perceive it, that we must strive to embrace in our
lives if we are to confront the root cause of our own limitations.
Thus, Rev. Spurgeon perceived the presence of the Key of Knowledge in
its opposite polarities (positive/negative, male/female), but lacked the third
element to the equation that unlocked the Mysteries of God that had the power
to harmonize and merge the many paradoxes of both the Bible and Creation
itself.
Because all of Creation has been formed in the Mind of God out of the very DNA of its Source -- the Divine Pattern of which is presented in the words: "So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them" (Gen 1:27 KJV) -- the more we begin to open our eyes and mind, the more we start to understand that all of Creation exists within the Divine Pattern of Duality -- i.e., male/female, light,dark, day/night, winter/summer, positive/negative. And once it is understood that all division exists as male/female polarities in relation to each other (see The Divine Marriage), then one can begin to embrace our own higher paradoxical reality. And when Adam (Man) expressed the need to merge the divided male/female (Adam/Eve) into "one flesh", was this any different than the teachings of Yeshua/Jesus that is found in many of the ancient texts, as presented in The Second Epistle of Clement where he writes: “Let us expect, therefore, hour by hour, the kingdom of God in love and righteousness, since we know not the day of the appearing of God. For the Lord Himself, being asked by one when His kingdom would come, replied, 'When two shall be one, that which is without as that which is within, and the male with the female, neither male nor female’”.
The later Church of Rome failed to comprehend the far-reaching reality of these words, because they were not only carnal, but of a heathen mind. Where the Church was very much like the carnal Jews who expected the Kingdom to come upon the earth -- and judged the validity of the Messiah/Christ by his ability to inaugurate the Kingdom -- both the carnal Jews and Christians failed to perceive the inner meaning of the scriptures and Yeshua's words when asked about the Kingdom: "Now when He was asked by the Pharisees when the kingdom of God would come, He answered them and said, The kingdom of God does not come with observation; nor will they say, 'See here!' or 'See there!' For indeed, the kingdom of God is within you" (Luke 17:20-21 NKJ). One of the realities of Creation that the carnal mind has great difficulty in comprehending is the reality of an inner world -- inner dimensions of consciousness -- inner parallel realms -- and ultimately, the Kingdom of God which exists at the very core and essence of our being. The idea that the movement of the Laws would create inner barriers that divided and segmented our mind and being, is simply incomprehensible to the average person. And yet, Yeshua not only said that the Kingdom of God would never come upon the earth in the manner that carnal men predict and look for it, but that our entrance into the Kingdom was contingent upon our overcoming our own outer divided natures. In the above teachings with respect to the coming of the Kingdom, the reply was: "'When two shall be one, that which is without as that which is within, and the male with the female, neither male nor female’”. So what this indicates is that our physical self not only has a divided nature, but that we have an inner and outer, and a divided male and female natures that must be made "one flesh" in order for the Kingdom to come within us.
It is of note that the Gospel of Thomas begins with the statement: "These are the secret sayings which the living Jesus spoke and which Didymos Judas Thomas wrote down. And he said, Whoever finds the interpretation of these sayings will not experience death. Jesus said, Let him who seeks continue seeking until he finds. When he finds, he will become troubled. When he becomes troubled, he will be astonished, and he will rule over the All." And the very first saying that follows this statement deals with the reality of the inner Kingdom: "Jesus said, If those who lead you say to you, 'See, the kingdom is in the sky,' then the birds of the sky will precede you. If they say to you, 'It is in the sea,' then the fish will precede you. Rather, the kingdom is inside of you, and it is outside of you. When you come to know yourselves, then you will become known, and you will realize that it is you who are the sons of the living father. But if you will not know yourselves, you dwell in poverty and it is you who are that poverty."
So
men of the flesh who perceive only the illusion of this world -- i.e., the "blemish...
created by colliding fields" --
fail to comprehend that everything they see is a symbol and form (a living
allegory) of the higher reality they are unable to perceive. They
fail to comprehend that within their own physical consciousness there is a
segment and division of personalities as portrayed in the teachings of Yeshua
as to when the Kingdom would come. Further, they fail to
comprehend that this division of powers and the multitude of personalities
that must be united within the mind of the disciple in search of the inner
Kingdom, is portrayed in the scriptures as a multitude of people, animals,
geographical places, and what appears to be historical accounts.
They have not idea that the scriptures are written in such a manner that they
can be turned within as the Key of Knowledge that opens the inner door to the
Kingdom. In the words of the Church Father Origen: “It is sufficient
however, to represent in the style of a historic narrative what is intended to
convey a secret meaning in the garb of history, that those who have the
capacity may work out for themselves all that relates to the subject.” And with regard to what would otherwise be interpreted
as historical
symbols and events that would appear to us as the knowledge of superficial
episodes of the past, Origen writes: “I
believe that every man must hold these things for images, under which the
hidden sense lies concealed” (Origen -
Huet., Prigeniana, 167 Franck, p. 142).
These great truths are again demonstrated in the words of Moses Maimonedes, one of the most respected of Jewish theologians, historian, and Talmudist, where he writes about the nature of scripture: “Every time that you find in our books a tale the reality of which seems impossible, a story which is repugnant to both reason and common sense, then be sure that the tale contains a profound allegory veiling a deeply mysterious truth; and the greater the absurdity of the letter, the deeper the wisdom of the spirit”. These same truths are again conveyed to us in the words of the Church Historian Eusebius: “Many were led astray by reading the allegorical contents of the scriptures literally in the method of the Pharisees and Sadducees”. What these symbols truly mean is perhaps best expressed by G.R.S. Mead in his celebrated work, Fragments of a Faith Forgotten, where he explained that, once properly understood, the true meaning of what is “…projected onto the screen…” of the scriptures, “…was in reality a picture of their [man’s] own minds”.
To
their own spiritual demise, the vast majority of Christians fail to comprehend
what Paul was attempting to convey when he warned that no one can be saved by
the works of the Law -- and referred to the letter that killeth. In the words of St. Augustine: “What
the apostle says pertains to this problem: 'For the letter killeth, but the
spirit quickeneth', that is, when that which is said figuratively is taken as
though it were literal, it is understood carnally.
Nor can anything more appropriately be called the death of the soul
than that condition in which the thing which distinguishes us from beasts,
which is the understanding, is subjected to the flesh in the pursuit of the
letter. He who follows the letter takes figurative expressions as
though they were literal and does not refer the things signified to anything
else” (De Doctrina Christiana).
When St. Augustine quotes Paul with regard to the saying “the letter killeth, but the spirit” makes alive, he is making reference to those who read the scriptures literally as historic narratives vs those who perceive the inner meaning of what is written. “Tell me, ye that desire to be under the law, do ye not hear the law?” Writes the Apostle Paul to those who want to read the written word literally. “For it is written, that Abraham had two sons, the one by a bondmaid, the other by a freewoman. But he who was of the bondwoman was born after the flesh; but he of the freewoman was by promise. Which things are an allegory” (Gal 4:21-24 KJV).
And if we ask the
question: Do the Jews know this? Do the Jews know that their Torah
and other scriptures are not historical -- but rather, an allegory that
conceals hidden truths of the soul and spirit?
So in the same way that we possess a multitude realities and dimensions within ourselves, so too does God possess the multitude of Creation within Himself -- "...for in Him we live and move and have our being... 'For we are also His offspring.'" (Acts 17:24-28 NKJ). And since we have hopefully arrived at the point where we can speculate that all that exists, exists in the Mind of God who has thought all that exists into being -- let us then examine the realities that are portrayed in these words and concepts -- concepts that Paul portrayed as inconceivable from a purely human pespective.
There are levels, realms and dimensions that exist within the layers of Creation -- and because each subsequent lower level is born out of the division of the higher, this division must be overcome in order for the lower level to transcend the barrier between worlds and realms, and know the higher. In the same way that prior to the separation of Eve, Adam and Eve were one and can be portrayed in the word Adam/Eve, so too is there a realm at the Absolute Essence of Creation where God is ONE. And in the same way that Eve came into being through the separation of the feminine nature from Adam -- and this reflective nature existed in potential prior to the separation -- so too did the polarities of Mother/Father God come into Being. And in the same way that Adam and Eve exist by virtue of the primal separation of Adam/Eve, so too does the separate Divine Polarities of Mother/Father God exist as Mother Father God in a realm where they exist in a Dualistic Presence. And in the same way that you are both separate from your own higher self, and yet you are intimately connected, so too does the Divine Polarities of Mother/Father God exist in a separate realm from the Unbegotten Ancient of Days, and yet these realms are intimately connected on a deeper level of Being.
Dualism
Misunderstood:
Now where
the Two exist, there is always the Third Force of Creation which is the
balance of the Two -- as is the child the product of its parents.
This Third Force is often referred to as the Logos, Word, or Son of God --
but in the writings of the ancients it was correctly known as the Mind of God. Why Mind?
Because thought is the movement between two paradoxical opposites -- and it
is this Third Force that either merges the two, causes them to be
opposing opposites, and every aspect of mind that would exist between these
two extremes. So in the case of Adam and Eve, the third
force is initially portrayed in the offspring of Cain and Abel who exist in conflict.
One of our
greatest errors in our educational systems today is seen in the attempt to
program the mind of the child -- i.e., force feed it with pre-determined
philosophical theories and foundations of thought which are counterfeit by
virtue of their divided insight -- rather than to stimulate the child
through the development of thought -- thought being that sphere that
merges paradoxical opposites that partisan politically correct philosophers
attempt to deny (see Lilith, The
Demonic Reality Of Feminism). By programming the child's mind, we rob the
child of knowing -- because knowing can only be achieved by con